If a person violates or attempts to violate one or more of the agreements, a person benefiting from the agreements, usually a neighboring landlord, can take legal action to enforce the restrictions. Courts generally interpret restrictive agreements strictly to allow a landowner to use his or her land for purposes not expressly prohibited by the restrictive agreements or by the local government. Thus, if a developer wants to limit a subdivision to single-family homes, it must specify “single-family home” and not “residential” in the agreement. Some commentators attributed the popularity of exclusionary alliances to the time in response to the urbanization of black Americans after World War I and fears of a “black invasion” into white neighborhoods, which residents said would lead to lower housing prices, increased harassment (crime), and social instability. :97–98 Many African Americans openly opposed these alliances and tried to “pioneer” restricted areas.  The application of restrictive agreements requires simultaneous considerations. In general, public policies value the right of individuals to freely exercise their chosen profession. Freedom of contract is considered a fundamental right. On the other hand, employers have legitimate interests that must be protected, such as customer relations, goodwill, investment in staff, and proprietary and confidential information.
In some industries, the public has an interest that the courts can protect. Health care is an example; Some States consider that the doctor-patient relationship is particularly worthy of protection, as a typical business relationship would allow. Trade development is another factor. In today`s global, internet-based marketplace, a broad geographic reach (even national) can make sense, depending on the industry. Restrictive agreements on a property can regulate how it is used by residents. For example, a restrictive agreement on a residential property could prevent any commercial activity on the property. This could prevent the resident from operating a home-based business or having a home office on-site. In general, the more negative covenants there are in a bond issue, the lower the interest rate on the debt, because the covenants make the bonds safer in the eyes of investors.
Cadastral titles to agricultural land are often subject to restrictive agreements aimed at preventing a change in land use other than agriculture or restricting its development. Restrictive agreements were once used for racial discrimination and specifically prohibited the sale of real estate to certain minorities. This practice is no longer legal. ⇒Your first step in answering a question about alliances should always be to identify the ally and ally. One of the usual restrictions imposed on borrowers by negative covenants is to prevent a bond issuer from issuing new debt until the maturity of one or more series of bonds. In addition, a corporate borrower may be prevented from paying dividends to shareholders above a certain amount so as not to increase the risk of default for bondholders, as the more money is paid to shareholders, the less funds are available to incur interest and principal payment obligations to lenders. A property contract is an agreement between two or more parties for the specific use of a property. The federal government will favour or impose a burden on the landowner. A clause that imposes a burden on the landowner is also known as a restrictive covenant. There are two types of restrictive alliances: positive and negative. A positive covenant requires a person to act.
For example, an agreement that requires the owner to prune trees in the yard is an affirmative agreement. A negative covenant forbids a person to act. For example, a negative clause may prohibit an owner from building fences. The burden of a restrictive arrangement will be on equity if these conditions are met: While exclusion agreements are not enforceable today, they still exist in many original title deeds as “underlying documents,” and title insurance policies often contain exclusions that prevent such restrictions from being covered.